Re: A Layered Kernel: Proposal

• Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "2.4.25 oops"
• In reply to: Grigor Gatchev: "Re: A Layered Kernel: Proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date:	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:33:38 -0800
To: Grigor Gatchev <grigor@serdica.org>

> While coding, think coding. While designing, think designing. Design comes
> before coding; otherwise you design while coding, and produce a mess.

You are describing, roughly, the waterfall model of software development.

Linux kernel work is closer to something resembling the prototype
and/or spiral model.

See further explanations of these terms, for instance, at:

  http://model.mercuryinteractive.com/references/models/

But, in any case, Linux kernel work _does_ have a rather extensively
articulated development model which we find is working rather well,
thank-you. For all I know, this methodology was defined by some
traumatic event at the birth of Linus - whatever - seems to work.

When in Rome, do as the Romans. And especially don't be surprised
at being pushed aside if you protest that we aren't behaving as the
French.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "2.4.25 oops"
• In reply to: Grigor Gatchev: "Re: A Layered Kernel: Proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]