Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay.
From: Josh McKinney (forming_at_charter.net)
Date: 03/09/04
- Previous message: Tim Schmielau: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6.x BSD Process Accounting w/High UID"
- In reply to: Craig Bradney: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay."
- Next in thread: Edd Dumbill: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:38:57 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On approximately Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:59:21PM +0100, Craig Bradney wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> I have put the idle=C1halt patch that Ross released a little while back
> now into Gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.3 as I reported to the list yesterday. I
> no longer use the old apic_tack=2 patch. I have been playing silly
> buggers with hardware, but so far the PC has made it to 11 hours and now
> 7 hours with no issues.
>
Just thought I would let everyone know that my A7N8X deluxe is up to:
13:34:38 up 18 days, 18:50, 7 users, load average: 1.00, 1.03, 1.02
with 2.6.3-mm1 and no other patches. I did put Ross's latest
idle=C1halt patch in their but forgot to pass the command-line arg. I
do have disconnect turned off here, with it on my speakers make a high
pitched buzzing noise. Of course, acpi, apic, local apic etc is
turned on. So does anyone have a sure fire way to hang this thing
yet?
-- Josh McKinney | Webmaster: http://joshandangie.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | They that can give up essential liberty Linux, the choice -o) | to obtain a little temporary safety deserve of the GNU generation /\ | neither liberty or safety. _\_v | -Benjamin Franklin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Tim Schmielau: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6.x BSD Process Accounting w/High UID"
- In reply to: Craig Bradney: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay."
- Next in thread: Edd Dumbill: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
