Re: [OT] Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)
From: Stefan Smietanowski (stesmi_at_stesmi.com)
Date: 03/10/04
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] 8139too Interframe Gap Time"
- In reply to: David Ford: "Re: [OT] Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: [OT] Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Reply: David Ford: "Re: [OT] Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:49:08 +0100 To: David Ford <david+challenge-response@blue-labs.org>
David Ford wrote:
> I won't. I didn't say anything against inability to preserve line
> boundaries. I was, and am, referring to linear text and letting the end
> user reflow that text to suit his or her preferences.
>
> viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
>
>> Kindly piss off. My mail reading software uses vi(1) to compose the
>> reply and has enough sense to preserve the line boundaries.
You also don't have a clue what replying below is all about nor do you
respond to anything regarding quotes. How many times haven't we seen
stupid quotes like this :
> blah blah long long line ..........................
end of last line > here is the second line that's quoted
end of second line......... > and here starts the third one.
If you haven't - lucky you. But don't try to push your
reply-above-and-don't-give-a-piss-about-others approach.
This list replies below and uses manually wrapped lines.
If you want to create your own linux kernel list with other
rules - be free to do so, but if you want to continue talking
on this one, follow the rules on it, don't try to push your own.
// Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] 8139too Interframe Gap Time"
- In reply to: David Ford: "Re: [OT] Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: [OT] Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Reply: David Ford: "Re: [OT] Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|