Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 03/11/04
- Previous message: Flavio Bruno Leitner: "Re: kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:370!"
- In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Next in thread: Godbole, Amarendra (GE Consumer & Industrial): "RE: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: root@chaos.analogic.com Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:48:14 -0500
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:22:49 EST, "Richard B. Johnson" said:
> No, and if you bothered to look at any code in the kernel, you'd
> note that uid and friends are always associated with some little
> pointy thingys. So, it wouldn't have been coded anything like that,
> anyway.
Fine.
+ if ((options == (__WCLONE|__WALL)) && (current->uid = 0))
Happy???
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Flavio Bruno Leitner: "Re: kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:370!"
- In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Next in thread: Godbole, Amarendra (GE Consumer & Industrial): "RE: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
