Re: dynamic sched timeslices
From: Kurt Garloff (garloff_at_suse.de)
Date: 03/18/04
- Previous message: Ross Dickson: "Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1"
- In reply to: Con Kolivas: "Re: dynamic sched timeslices"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: dynamic sched timeslices"
- Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: dynamic sched timeslices"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:20:27 +0100 To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Hi Con,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 07:45:02AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > That's why I think we should offer the tunables.
>
> If your workload is so dedicated to just number crunching it isn't hard to add
> a zero to maximum timeslice in kernel/sced.c.
Of course I can compile a custom kernel for myself and tune all sorts of
things. But this is not the way most Linux users want to use Linux any
more. Actually that's a long time ago.
Best regards,
-- Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de> [Koeln, DE] Physics:Plasma modeling <garloff@plasimo.phys.tue.nl> [TU Eindhoven, NL] Linux: SUSE Labs (Head) <garloff@suse.de> [SUSE Nuernberg, DE]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Ross Dickson: "Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1"
- In reply to: Con Kolivas: "Re: dynamic sched timeslices"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: dynamic sched timeslices"
- Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: dynamic sched timeslices"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]