Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review
From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik_at_pobox.com)
Date: 03/18/04
- Previous message: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review"
- In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review"
- Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review"
- Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:00:02 -0500 To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Sorry, Jeff, but that's just not true. While ioctls need an additional
> entry in the conversion table, they can at least easily get an
> translation handler if needed. When they are correctly designed you
> just need a single line to enable pass through the emulation.
> If you don't want to add that line to the generic compat_ioctl.h
> file you can also do it in your driver.
>
> read/write has the big disadvantage that if someone gets the emulation
> wrong (and that happens regularly) it is near impossible to add an
> emulation handler then, because there is no good way to hook
> into the read/write paths.
>
> There may be valid reasons to go for read/write, but 32bit emulation
> is not one of them. In fact from the emulation perspective read/write
> should be avoided.
I'll probably have to illustrate with code, but basically, read/write
can be completely ignorant of 32/64-bit architecture, endianness, it can
even be network-transparent. ioctls just can't do that.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review"
- In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review"
- Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review"
- Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|