Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1
From: Bernd Schubert (bernd-schubert_at_web.de)
Date: 03/18/04
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: True fsync() in Linux (on IDE)"
- In reply to: Ross Dickson: "Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1"
- Next in thread: Ross Dickson: "Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1"
- Reply: Ross Dickson: "Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: ross@datscreative.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:41:42 +0100
Hi,
I'm just testing your IdleC1Halt patch (didn't reboot yet) with 2.6.4, but
there is a problem if apm is enabled in the configuration:
arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x10b65): In function `apm_cpu_idle':
: undefined reference to `default_idle'
Your patch sets default_idle() static, so its not available in apm.c file.
Usually I compile with acpi and apm support to switch between both in case of
an unsual problem, and I think many people also do so.
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-02/6520.html
> The KERNEL ARG to invoke it is "idle=C1halt".
>
Thanks,
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: True fsync() in Linux (on IDE)"
- In reply to: Ross Dickson: "Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1"
- Next in thread: Ross Dickson: "Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1"
- Reply: Ross Dickson: "Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]