Re: tulip (pnic) errors in 2.6.5-rc1
From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap_at_osdl.org)
Date: 03/18/04
- Previous message: Dave Hansen: "Re: Active defragmentation : A replacement for bigphysarea?"
- In reply to: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: tulip (pnic) errors in 2.6.5-rc1"
- Next in thread: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: tulip (pnic) errors in 2.6.5-rc1"
- Reply: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: tulip (pnic) errors in 2.6.5-rc1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:09:07 -0800 To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:29:39 +0100 Mikael Pettersson wrote:
| Jeff Garzik writes:
| > Mikael Pettersson wrote:
| > > Jeff Garzik writes:
| > > > er, oops... lemme find the right patch...
| > >
| > > No change, still a flood of those tulip_rx() interrupt messages.
| >
| > hmmm. Well, it is something unrelated to tulip driver, then.
|
| Testing older -bk versions I've found that 2.6.4-bk2
| is Ok but 2.6.4-bk3 has this message flood problem.
Other than the netdev_priv() changes, I see removal of
KERNEL_SYSCALLS and the addition of CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER.
Are you enabling CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER?
If so, can you test with it disabled?
Thanks,
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Dave Hansen: "Re: Active defragmentation : A replacement for bigphysarea?"
- In reply to: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: tulip (pnic) errors in 2.6.5-rc1"
- Next in thread: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: tulip (pnic) errors in 2.6.5-rc1"
- Reply: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: tulip (pnic) errors in 2.6.5-rc1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
