Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines.......
From: Stephen Smalley (sds_at_epoch.ncsc.mil)
Date: 03/18/04
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: sched_setaffinity usability"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines......."
- Next in thread: Andy Whitcroft: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines......."
- Reply: Andy Whitcroft: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines......."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:22:47 -0500
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 15:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Seems reasonable, although "vm_enough_acctdom" makes my eyes pop. Why not
> keep the "vm_enough_memory" identifier?
>
> I've asked Stephen for comment - assuming he's OK with it I'd ask you to
> finish this off please.
To keep the name, he needs to update all callers, right? Current patch
appears to add a static inline for security_vm_enough_memory that
retains the old interface to avoid having to update most callers.
I don't have any fundamental problem with the nature of the change. As
a side note, patch was malformed (at least as I received it), not sure
if that was just a problem on my end.
-- Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil> National Security Agency - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: sched_setaffinity usability"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines......."
- Next in thread: Andy Whitcroft: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines......."
- Reply: Andy Whitcroft: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines......."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|