Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory machines.......

From: Stephen Smalley (sds_at_epoch.ncsc.mil)
Date: 03/18/04

  • Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: sched_setaffinity usability"
    To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
    Date:	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:22:47 -0500
    
    

    On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 15:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Seems reasonable, although "vm_enough_acctdom" makes my eyes pop. Why not
    > keep the "vm_enough_memory" identifier?
    >
    > I've asked Stephen for comment - assuming he's OK with it I'd ask you to
    > finish this off please.

    To keep the name, he needs to update all callers, right? Current patch
    appears to add a static inline for security_vm_enough_memory that
    retains the old interface to avoid having to update most callers.

    I don't have any fundamental problem with the nature of the change. As
    a side note, patch was malformed (at least as I received it), not sure
    if that was just a problem on my end.

    -- 
    Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
    National Security Agency
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: sched_setaffinity usability"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations
      ... Maybe putting them in -mm tree could give them the test environment they ... But even if the patch gets in, there are still some cases that I don't ... > would have to audit all callers to make sure that they handle the NULL ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [3/4] [PATCH]Diskdump - yet another crash dump function
      ... see the patch below. ... All callers of __run_timersrun with irqs ... we unconditionally disable interrupts after having run the timer ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
      ... On 8/30/05, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: ... >> there's no longer any need for callers of that function to check for NULL. ... I'll remember that and either update the patch or send a small ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 2.6.6-rc3: modular DVB tda1004x broken
      ... >> How about this patch? ... > callers need to do it, ... I'd rather kill opencompletely - we only have a handful of in-tree users ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • [patch 2.6.13 (take #2)] swiotlb: BUG() for DMA_NONE in sync_single
      ... Also remove unnecessary checks for DMA_NONE in callers of sync_single. ... This patch replaces the previous patch with the same subject. ... sync_single(hwdev, dma_addr, size, dir, target); ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)