Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]
From: Joel Jaeggli (joelja_at_darkwing.uoregon.edu)
Date: 03/24/04
- Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6.3 Posix scheduling violation for !SCHED_OTHER"
- In reply to: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]"
- Next in thread: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]"
- Reply: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:05:49 -0800 (PST) To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net>
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Wow. That cc list is growing. I'm going to trim it since those guys are
> subscribed to LKML or swsusp-devel anyway.
>
> On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 11:45, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
> > Speaking from an swsusp user (not developer) this is the best thing
> > imho. Some people just love eye candy :)
>
> I think it's really important that we have some eye candy. This is going
> to be one of the most visible parts of the kernel, and for some people,
> it's going to be the thing they stare at most of the time when they
> start up/shut down. If we want to help the cause of Linux on the
> desktop, we want it to look good. As long as its within reasonable
> bounds, a small increase in kernel size is worth it, in my opinion.
I'd settle for just having something that worked, in a released kernel.
the patch load I'm carrying around to make most of the hardware in my vaio
work is more of a shambling mound than a source of stability and
goodness...
> Nigel
>
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6.3 Posix scheduling violation for !SCHED_OTHER"
- In reply to: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]"
- Next in thread: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]"
- Reply: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|