Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight
From: Jeremy Martin (martinjd_at_csc.uvic.ca)
Date: 04/12/04
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Where did the USB generic scanner driver go? 2.6.5"
- In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight"
- Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight"
- Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight"
- Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:29:16 -0700 To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:15:51AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> This netif_running() check is not necessary, and in fact
> wrong.
>
> In fact, if ethernet drivers erroneously do this, this causes
> them to fail to support the ALB bonding driver modes which
> require on-the-fly MAC address changes while the interface is
> up.
>
I just took a look in drivers/net/
and
acenic.c
atarilance.c
b44.c
cs89x0.c
net_init.c
typhoon.c
all use that netif_running() check when setting the MAC. I actually just pulled
the function from net_init.c for the tun change. Are these broken?
(I'm asking in total ignorance so be gentle :).
-Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Where did the USB generic scanner driver go? 2.6.5"
- In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight"
- Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight"
- Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight"
- Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] fix tuntap oversight"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|