Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix
From: Jon Grimm (jgrimm2_at_us.ibm.com)
Date: 04/14/04
- Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fix mq_notify with SIGEV_NONE notification"
- In reply to: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix"
- Next in thread: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix"
- Reply: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:53:47 -0500 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Ross Dickson wrote:
>
>> > Was it determined that the fix was bogus? damaging? fixable?
>>
>>I thought the patch was OK with typos fixed.
>>
>>
>
> I consider it final.
>
>
I 've been running the patch on a 2.4.21 code base. I note that
/proc/interrupts shows NMI interrupts coming in fast and furious, where
without it there were none. I'm not sure what to think of this.
Any idea whether this could/should be expected?
Best Regards,
Jon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fix mq_notify with SIGEV_NONE notification"
- In reply to: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix"
- Next in thread: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix"
- Reply: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]