Re: [patch] 2.6.6-rc2 Allow architectures to reenable interrupts on contended spinlocks
From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 04/27/04
- Previous message: Ian Kent: "Re: sparc64 2.6.6-rc2-mm2 build busted: usb/core/hub.c hubstatus"
- In reply to: Keith Owens: "[patch] 2.6.6-rc2 Allow architectures to reenable interrupts on contended spinlocks"
- Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.6.6-rc2 Allow architectures to reenable interrupts on contended spinlocks"
- Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.6.6-rc2 Allow architectures to reenable interrupts on contended spinlocks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 21:49:52 -0700 To: Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>
Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> Enable interrupts while waiting for a disabled spinlock, but only if
> interrupts were enabled before issuing spin_lock_irqsave(). It makes a
> measurable difference to interrupt servicing on large systems.
Do you know which are the offending locks?
How much difference, and how large are the systems?
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ian Kent: "Re: sparc64 2.6.6-rc2-mm2 build busted: usb/core/hub.c hubstatus"
- In reply to: Keith Owens: "[patch] 2.6.6-rc2 Allow architectures to reenable interrupts on contended spinlocks"
- Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.6.6-rc2 Allow architectures to reenable interrupts on contended spinlocks"
- Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.6.6-rc2 Allow architectures to reenable interrupts on contended spinlocks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|