Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license
From: Stephen Hemminger (shemminger_at_osdl.org)
Date: 04/29/04
- Previous message: Tom Rini: "Re: [PATCH] fix warning in arch/ppc/boot/simple/misc.c"
- In reply to: Marc Boucher: "Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license"
- Next in thread: Timothy Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license"
- Reply: Timothy Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:08:06 -0700 To: Marc Boucher <marc@linuxant.com>
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:40:43 -0400
Marc Boucher <marc@linuxant.com> wrote:
lent majority.
>
> > If the "real-world" forces you to do something
> > that gives up those rights (loading a binary module) the kernel should
> > definitely
> > make the user aware.
>
> The important part here is making the user aware, which we have clearly
> done.
>
> Marc
No, the important thing is to admit when you were *wrong* and fix the problem.
But many people suffer from inability to admit a mistake (like GWB).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Tom Rini: "Re: [PATCH] fix warning in arch/ppc/boot/simple/misc.c"
- In reply to: Marc Boucher: "Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license"
- Next in thread: Timothy Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license"
- Reply: Timothy Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
