Spam: Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]
From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 05/21/04
- Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: ramfs lfs limit"
- In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]"
- Next in thread: Alexey Kopytov: "Re: Spam: Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]"
- Reply: Alexey Kopytov: "Re: Spam: Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 01:56:47 -0700 To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
>
> I think that's pretty similar. Andrew didn't say what device he was
> testing on, but 2.4 ide defaults to max 64k where 2.6 defaults to 128k.
IDE.
I was being silly, sorry. Those I/O stats include the (huge linear)
initial write of the "database" files, so the larger IDE request size will
be dominating.
What I need is a way of getting sysbench to create and remove the database
files in separate invokations, but the syntax for that is defeating me at
present.
> > I'll take a guess at b, and say it could be as-iosched.c.
> > Another thing might be that 2.6 has smaller nr_requests than
> > 2.4, although you are unlikely to hid the read side limit
> > with only 16 threads if they are doing sync IO.
>
> Andrew, you did numbers for deadline previously as well, but no rq
> statistics there? As for nr_requests that's true, would be worth a shot
> to bump available requests in 2.6.
Doubling the request queue size makes no difference.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: ramfs lfs limit"
- In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]"
- Next in thread: Alexey Kopytov: "Re: Spam: Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]"
- Reply: Alexey Kopytov: "Re: Spam: Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|