Re: Performance Tuning
From: Prakash K. Cheemplavam (PrakashKC_at_gmx.de)
Date: 05/20/04
- Previous message: Stephen Hemminger: "[PATCH] fix return value for sysfs_rename_dir stub"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: Performance Tuning"
- Next in thread: Tim Bird: "Re: Performance Tuning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 18:49:48 +0200 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2004 12:05:15 -0000, john weber <weber@sixbit.org> said:
>
>
>>Kernel compiles take 6m38s on my P4 2.8GHz (with HT enabled) and
>>512 MB RAM as compared to 20-30 seconds reported by folks online.
>>I am running kernel 2.6.6.
[snip]
> Seriously - the only way to do a kernel build in 20 seconds is to use 'make
> -j20' or so, and have enough processors to handle it, and enough RAM so that
> you can basically do the whole thing in the fin-core cache rather than beating
> on the disk....
20sec sounds very far from reality for me. I have athlon xp@2.2GHz and
with gcc3.4 it takes about 4min to compile a 2.6.6-mm kernel. Using
gcc3.3.x it needs minutes more.
Prakash
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Stephen Hemminger: "[PATCH] fix return value for sysfs_rename_dir stub"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: Performance Tuning"
- Next in thread: Tim Bird: "Re: Performance Tuning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
