why swap at all?
From: Anthony DiSante (orders_at_nodivisions.com)
Date: 05/26/04
- Previous message: Durairaj, Sundarapandian: "RE: [BK PATCH] PCI Express patches for 2.4.27-pre3"
- Next in thread: Buddy Lumpkin: "RE: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Buddy Lumpkin: "RE: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Roger Luethi: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Helge Hafting: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Reply: John Bradford: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Raphael Jacquot: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Piszcz, Justin Michael: "RE: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Satoshi Oshima: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Andy Lutomirski: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Piszcz, Justin Michael: "RE: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Brennan: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 02:38:23 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
As a general question about ram/swap and relating to some of the issues in
this thread:
~500 megs cached yet 2.6.5 goes into swap hell
Consider this: I have a desktop system with 256MB ram, so I make a 256MB
swap partition. So I have 512MB "memory" and if some process wants more,
too bad, there is no more.
Now I buy another 256MB of ram, so I have 512MB of real memory. Why not
just disable my swap completely now? I won't have increased my memory's
size at all, but won't I have increased its performance lots?
Or, to make it more appealing, say I initially had 512MB ram and now I have
1GB. Wouldn't I much rather not use swap at all anymore, in this case, on
my desktop?
-Anthony
http://nodivisions.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Durairaj, Sundarapandian: "RE: [BK PATCH] PCI Express patches for 2.4.27-pre3"
- Next in thread: Buddy Lumpkin: "RE: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Buddy Lumpkin: "RE: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Roger Luethi: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Helge Hafting: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Reply: John Bradford: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Raphael Jacquot: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Piszcz, Justin Michael: "RE: why swap at all?"
- Reply: Satoshi Oshima: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Andy Lutomirski: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Piszcz, Justin Michael: "RE: why swap at all?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Brennan: "Re: why swap at all?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|