Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission
From: Larry McVoy (lm_at_bitmover.com)
Date: 05/28/04
- Previous message: Andries.Brouwer_at_cwi.nl: "[PATCH] update comment"
- In reply to: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission"
- Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 10:16:59 -0700 To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" <piggy@timesys.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> A compromise position might be to store multiple authorships (who
> committed it into BK, who was the original author, etc.) into the SCM
> metadata, but I'm not sure we could justify your putting that kind
> feature into BK, especially when it's likely that the only users of it
> would be the Linux kernel tree.
We're always open to adding new features but we're not going to code around
delibrate misuse of the system. We wouldn't be doing you any favors by
doing so. If you ever migrate off of BK then you'll need the next system
to have those same workarounds.
Go educate Linus that he got this one wrong, he's a reasonable guy, he
listens if enough people scream.
-- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andries.Brouwer_at_cwi.nl: "[PATCH] update comment"
- In reply to: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission"
- Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
