Re: more files with licenses that aren't GPL-compatible

From: Eric (eric_at_cisu.net)
Date: 06/16/04

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [Announce] Non Invasive Kernel Monitor for threads/processes"
    To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    Date:	Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:38:02 -0500
    
    

    On Tuesday 15 June 2004 03:57 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > While I don't want to jump into the usual Debian wankfest whether Linux
    > as GPL'ed project can distribute hex-images of firmware at all there are
    > a few firmware C headers files that have a license statement that aren't
    > GPL-compatible at all, namely the keyspan firmware in
    > drivers/usb/serial/keyspan*_fw.h with the following license text:

    --*snip*--

    > Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of this firmware
    > image as part of a Linux or other Open Source operating system kernel
    > in text or binary form as required.

    > This firmware may not be modified and may only be used with
    > Keyspan hardware. Distribution and/or Modification of the
    > keyspan.c driver which includes this firmware, in whole or in
    > part, requires the inclusion of this statement."
    > ---------------------------- snip ----------------------------
    >
    > which makes the kernel as whole unredistributable. A similar license
    > was according to Greg also recently granted for
    > drivers/usb/misc/emi62_fw_*.h which currently has even worse license
    > statements in there.

    Unredistributable? Am I mistaken? It says permission is given to redistribute
    this piece as part of the linux kernel. You just can't modify it. Although it
    is unquestionably not a very permissive license, it's inclusion is not
    detrimental to the kernel.

    Please correct me if I am wrong.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [Announce] Non Invasive Kernel Monitor for threads/processes"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Wasting our Freedom
      ... someone took the linux kernel source from the official repository, ... removed the GPL license and dedicated the work to public domain or put ... core kernel community, and the FSF, are distinct, and while they might ... and removal of the BSD license text, and that is one where the SFLC ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re[2]: 2.6.16 serious consequences / GPL_EXPORT_SYMBOL / USB drivers of major vendor excluded
      ... is only truly feasible in kernel space. ... Even though people might do realtime DSP things in user space with Linux ... using usbfs directly, no kernel driver needed. ... release your code under this same license. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
      ... wasn't getting the same performance under Linux - which rather surprised me. ... As has been noted in their TOS and the licenses for the hardware from the ... concerned that the license will change under them in such a way that even ... Linux is the kernel. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
      ... You could, however, get a license for BSD for a LOT ... Despite the arguments into calling it GNU/Linux or simply Linux, it has its place for many of us users who are very happy to run it. ... I think the consensus is that Linux is the kernel and Gnu makes up most of the rest of the OS. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea
      ... this license" clause (except, now, the version being used with the Linux ... work on GLP v3.5 which will allow easy reuse CDDL code under Linux .. ... Note that I said "Except the Linux Kernel". ...
      (Linux-Kernel)

    Loading