Re: Inclusion of UML in 2.6.8
From: David Eger (eger_at_havoc.gtf.org)
Date: 06/28/04
- Previous message: Robert Picco: "Re: [PATCH] hpet related"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Inclusion of UML in 2.6.8"
- Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: Inclusion of UML in 2.6.8"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:18:01 -0400 To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:40:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > But work in progress, for which oneself is still the primary source, is
> > fluid. You can slice and dice and redo it, and indeed you want to, to
> > get the best patch set. Quilt and friends rule for this stuff.
>
> Good description, that. quilt is a grown-up version of patch-scripts, and
> is tailored to what I do, and to what distributors do: maintain a series of
> diffs against a monolithic tree which someone else maintains.
>
> > Conclusion - use Quilt (with your favorite personal version control) on
> > top of Bitkeeper.
>
> yup. I use patch-scripts+CVS in the way which you describe.
I had been wondering how you deal with so many patches...
So do people actually use bitKeeper for more than the following:
(1) glorified 'cp -r'
(2) memory of the history of the tree from which we did a 'cp -r'
-dte
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Robert Picco: "Re: [PATCH] hpet related"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Inclusion of UML in 2.6.8"
- Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: Inclusion of UML in 2.6.8"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
