Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix
From: Matt Heler (lkml_at_lpbproductions.com)
Date: 07/07/04
- Previous message: Bryce Harrington: "Re: [LTP] Re: Recent changes in LTP test results"
- In reply to: Redeeman: "Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix"
- Next in thread: qubes_at_darklands.zimres.net: "Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix"
- Reply: qubes_at_darklands.zimres.net: "Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix"
- Reply: Redeeman: "Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Redeeman <lkml@metanurb.dk> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:12:23 -0700
Not to sound mean about this. But either you prove your claim with benchmarks
in a controlled enviroment ( that means in a private network ), or you stop
trolling and complaining. The linux kernel is a free piece of software, if
you don't like one version of it, then feel free to use some earlier version.
Otherwise please stop.
Matt H.
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 5:42 pm, Redeeman wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:30 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
> > Redeeman <lkml@metanurb.dk> said:
> > > On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 17:54 -0700, Matt Heler wrote:
> > > > Ok first take benchmarks ( use wget ), and secondly results from the
> > > > internet vary day by day , hour to hour , minute by minute. Don't
> > > > expect all sites on the internet to be the same speed, or even stay
> > > > the same speed for that matter. For more accurate benchmark results
> > > > setup a personal server on your own private network and benchmark
> > > > http trasnfers using different kernels.
> > >
> > > i am aware of this, however, what i use to benchmark is kernel.org, as
> > > i can see they have alot bandwith free.
> >
> > How do you know that?
>
> how i know? i dont think anyone in the matter of seconds begin to use
> the spare ~800mbit/s of bandwith they do not use when i try, (according
> to info from bwbar on kernel.org)
>
> > > if i use kernel.org http i get 50kb/s, if i use ftp, i can easily fetch
> > > with 200kb/s
> >
> > Trafic shaping somewhere along the route? Much more load on HTTP than
> > FTP? Are they the very same machines? Under the exact same load? Are the
> > servers written with the same care? Are the clients?
> >
> > > also, the gnu ftp, where i took gcc3.4.1, it gave me 200kb/s
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
> > Unless you set up something where there aren't dozens of unknown
> > variables and a hundred or so that you have got no chance at all to even
> > guess what their values/effects are...
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Bryce Harrington: "Re: [LTP] Re: Recent changes in LTP test results"
- In reply to: Redeeman: "Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix"
- Next in thread: qubes_at_darklands.zimres.net: "Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix"
- Reply: qubes_at_darklands.zimres.net: "Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix"
- Reply: Redeeman: "Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
