Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL
viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Date: 07/07/04
- Previous message: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- In reply to: Ray Lee: "Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Next in thread: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Reply: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 04:02:27 +0100 To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 07:05:01PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> [1] "The great thing about standards is that there are so many
> of them to choose from." Wish I could remember who said
> that.
AST and in this case it actually doesn't apply - everything from K&R
to C99 is in agreement here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- In reply to: Ray Lee: "Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Next in thread: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Reply: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|