Re: [OT] Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL
From: Andries Brouwer (aebr_at_win.tue.nl)
Date: 07/08/04
- Previous message: Martin Josefsson: "Re: window tracking firewall involved, was: Re: preliminary conclusions regarding window size issues"
- In reply to: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: [OT] Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Next in thread: Michael Driscoll: "Re: [OT] Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Reply: Michael Driscoll: "Re: [OT] Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:41:21 +0200 To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:15:21PM +0100, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> - Dirichlet Principle bites you anyway.
Ah, it took me a few seconds to reconstruct what principle
you are referring to.
I am used to seeing "Dirichlet Principle" in a context where
one wants to solve a boundary value problem for certain elliptic
partial differential equations. (Then the principle states,
roughly, that the unique solution is found by minimizing
some integral.)
You invoke what I am used to call the pigeonhole principle.
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Martin Josefsson: "Re: window tracking firewall involved, was: Re: preliminary conclusions regarding window size issues"
- In reply to: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: [OT] Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Next in thread: Michael Driscoll: "Re: [OT] Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Reply: Michael Driscoll: "Re: [OT] Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|