Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining.
From: Arjan van de Ven (arjanv_at_redhat.com)
Date: 07/09/04
- Previous message: Andrew Morton: "2.6.7-mm7"
- In reply to: Zan Lynx: "Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining."
- Next in thread: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining."
- Reply: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 08:54:03 +0200
>
> I believe that just adding -funit-at-a-time as a compile option solves
> the problems with inline function body ordering.
... except that -funit-at-a-time causes some functions to use more than
4Kb of *extra* stack, even without CONFIG_4KSTACKS that's a ticking
timebomb of enormous magnitude..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Andrew Morton: "2.6.7-mm7"
- In reply to: Zan Lynx: "Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining."
- Next in thread: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining."
- Reply: Alexandre Oliva: "Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]