Re: 1000 days uptime.
From: Rob Couto (rpc_at_cafe4111.org)
Date: 07/11/04
- Previous message: Andy Isaacson: "Re: bk pull from bkbits screwy?"
- In reply to: Nick Warne: "1000 days uptime."
- Next in thread: Wakko Warner: "Re: 1000 days uptime."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:41:55 -0400
On Saturday 10 July 2004 04:31 pm, you wrote:
> This is a 486 box serving web pages from a home base (via NFS to gateway).
> No UPS, no special treatment expect dust and usual day-to-day abuse stuck
> under two other boxes in a 'stack' of sorts I done a long time ago...
Wow. I wish -my- power wouldn't go out for 2 and a half years...
> Thank _you all_ for the great work :)
hell yeah, thanks for this most excellent hammer for our Windows Smashing Kit
;)
-- Rob Couto [rpc@cafe4111.org] computer safety tip: use only a non-conducting, static-free hammer. EDIT: --unless Internet Explorer is involved. -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andy Isaacson: "Re: bk pull from bkbits screwy?"
- In reply to: Nick Warne: "1000 days uptime."
- Next in thread: Wakko Warner: "Re: 1000 days uptime."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
