Re: [2.6 patch] e1000_main.c: fix inline compile errors
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_fs.tum.de)
Date: 07/15/04
- Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [syslinux] Re: Possible bug with kernel decompressor."
- In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [2.6 patch] e1000_main.c: fix inline compile errors"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] e1000_main.c: fix inline compile errors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:46:23 +0200 To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:13:59PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>...
> As you go thru them, consider removing inline keyword for
> such large functions.
>...
I did propose this as an alternative approach in the text that
accopagnied the patch.
My main reason for not directly proposing to remove the inlines was the
fact that all inline functions were either very small or called only
once.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [syslinux] Re: Possible bug with kernel decompressor."
- In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [2.6 patch] e1000_main.c: fix inline compile errors"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] e1000_main.c: fix inline compile errors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
