Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop
From: Paul Rolland (rol_at_as2917.net)
Date: 07/22/04
- Previous message: Eva Dominguez: "Re: aditional parallel port problems"
- In reply to: James Morris: "Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop"
- Next in thread: Martin Schlemmer: "Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop"
- Reply: Martin Schlemmer: "Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "'James Morris'" <jmorris@redhat.com>, <dpf-lkml@fountainbay.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:58:41 +0200
Hello,
Well, we have an option to be able to select EXPERIMENTAL code when
making a configuration, why not adding on option for DEPRECATED code ?
Then, you'd just have to migrate cryptoloop into this DEPRECATED
area.
Kconfig should be able to handle that very easily !
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex-AS2917 Network administrator and Peering Coordinator
-- Please no HTML, I'm not a browser - Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un navigateur "Some people dream of success... while others wake up and work hard at it" > -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de James Morris > Envoyé : jeudi 22 juillet 2004 07:22 > À : dpf-lkml@fountainbay.com > Cc : Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Objet : Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 dpf-lkml@fountainbay.com wrote: > > > Ditching cryptoloop completely in 2.7 after dm-crypt > matures would be a > > better idea. > > Part of the reason for dropping cryptoloop is to help > dm-crypt mature more > quickly. > > I've had some off-list email on the security of dm-crypt, and it seems > that it does need some work. We need to get the security > right more than > we need to worry about these other issues. > > Let's drop the technically inferior of the two (cryptoloop) and > concentrate on fixing the other (dm-crypt). > > There was a thread on redesigning the security a while back (subject: > "dm-crypt, new IV and standards"), but no code came out of > it. Anyone > interested should probably have a look at that. > > > - James > -- > James Morris > <jmorris@redhat.com> > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Eva Dominguez: "Re: aditional parallel port problems"
- In reply to: James Morris: "Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop"
- Next in thread: Martin Schlemmer: "Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop"
- Reply: Martin Schlemmer: "Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|