Re: New dev model (was [PATCH] delete devfs)

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_fs.tum.de)
Date: 07/23/04

  • Next message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [RFC]: CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED (was: Re: [PATCH] delete devfs)"
    Date:	Fri, 23 Jul 2004 21:59:23 +0200
    To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
    
    

    On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 06:21:27AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
    > > So now the world is divided in gods (i.e distributions) and we,
    > > mere mortals who should pray to the gods to give us a stable
    > > kernel ?
    >
    > This seems to be where a lot of the misunderstanding is. Did anybody
    > notice just how divergent the distributors' 2.4 (and prior) kernels were
    > from the mainline? If you wanted a kernel with that level of features
    > and stability, you had to get it from them - or apply hundreds of
    > patches yourself.

    The 2.4.18 kernel source in Debian stable in has at about 300kB patches
    applied (gzip'ed 60kB), and many of them fix security bugs that were
    reported since 2.4.18 was released.

    > One of the goals of the process now is to get those distributor patches
    > into the mainline quickly. My expectation is that the mainline kernel
    > will be far closer to what the distributors ship than it has been in a
    > long time, and the mainline will be more stable for it. Just the
    > opposite of what a lot of people are saying.

    OTOH, distributions might have to ship more kernel versions and provide
    security updates for more kernels if features in newer 2.6 kernels break
    architectures or subarchitectures they support.

    > jon

    cu
    Adrian

    -- 
           "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
            of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
           "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                           Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [RFC]: CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED (was: Re: [PATCH] delete devfs)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Bloat report 2.6.3 -> 2.6.4
      ... For the average computer you can buy at your supermarket today it isn't ... People who need to care about the size of the kernel use hand-tuned ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: ANNOUNCE: CE Linux Forum - Specification V1.0 draft
      ... Kernel SHALL be configuralble with compiler size options, ... "specification" didn't send a patch - the trivial patch was sent by ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Weirdness with suspending jobs in 2.6.9-rc3
      ... >> It doesn't depend on which version I'm compiling, ... >> kernel I'm actually running. ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH] OCFS2
      ... > It's a generic mechanism for userspace driven configuration of kernel ... > subsystems/projects could use it too, ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [2.6 patch] add a config option for -Os compilation
      ... kernel with some supported compilers) ... there might be fast path code somewhere in the kernel that becomes ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)