Re: [RFC]: CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED
From: Stephen Wille Padnos (spadnos_at_sover.net)
Date: 07/24/04
- Previous message: Prakash K. Cheemplavam: "Re: [OT] German court says the GPL is effective"
- In reply to: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [RFC]: CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED (was: Re: [PATCH] delete devfs)"
- Next in thread: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] delete devfs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 18:01:14 -0400 To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:06:40PM +0200, R. J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>>..
>>>2. Proposal
>>>
>>>I propose to introduce a new configuration option CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, such
>>><--------- big snip --------->
>>>
>Stuff is marked OBSOLETE in Kconfig files, and text for menu option is
>reflecting this.
>This can well be overlooed if one does 'make oldconfig' only,
>but at least documented this way.
>
> Sam
>
Good point.
A better name for this config option might be CONFIG_OBSOLETE, with the
semantics described in R. J. Wysocki's original post.
- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Prakash K. Cheemplavam: "Re: [OT] German court says the GPL is effective"
- In reply to: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [RFC]: CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED (was: Re: [PATCH] delete devfs)"
- Next in thread: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] delete devfs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|