Re: [patch] kernel events layer
From: Robert Love (rml_at_ximian.com)
Date: 07/24/04
- Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: [patch] kernel events layer"
- In reply to: Dan Aloni: "Re: [patch] kernel events layer"
- Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] kernel events layer"
- Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] kernel events layer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Dan Aloni <da-x@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:47:06 -0400
On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 00:32 +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> IMHO you either should not assume anything about the length of the object
> string, _or_ do the complete safe string assembly e.g:
>
> len += snprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "From: %s\nSignal: %s\n",
> object, signal);
>
Fair enough. I guess what we want, exactly, is:
len = snprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "From: %s\n", object);
len += snprintf(&buffer[len], PAGE_SIZE - len "Signal: %s\n", signal);
I will add that to the next revision.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: [patch] kernel events layer"
- In reply to: Dan Aloni: "Re: [patch] kernel events layer"
- Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] kernel events layer"
- Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] kernel events layer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
