Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks
From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 07/27/04
- Previous message: Philippe Troin: "Re: lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags!!!"
- In reply to: Benjamin Rutt: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Hans Reiser: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Reply: Hans Reiser: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Reply: Benjamin Rutt: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Reply: Nathan Scott: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:40:05 -0700 To: Benjamin Rutt <rutt.4+news@osu.edu>
(Please don't remove people from the email recipient list when doing kernel
work.)
Benjamin Rutt <rutt.4+news@osu.edu> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
>
> > Benjamin Rutt <rutt.4+news@osu.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> How can I purge all of the kernel's filesystem caches, so I can trust
> >> that my I/O (read) requests I'm trying to benchmark bypass the kernel
> >> filesystem cache?
> >
> > Either delete the benchmark test files or
>
> I'm not sure I follow. If I delete the benchmark files, I'll only
> need to create them again later in order to do a read test, and I'll
> have the same problem then, of how to eliminate the just-written-data
> from cache.
OK.
> Thanks for the reference, I wasn't aware of that one. We are running
> some 2.4 kernels in our storage cluster unfortunately so that won't be
> usable for us everywhere. I take it POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED is ignored
> under 2.4.
posix_fadvise() will return -ENOSYS under 2.4.
However... If you write any amount of data to a file with O_DIRECT, that
will, as a side-effect, remove _all_ of that file's pagecache. In 2.4 as
well as 2.6. So you could scrub the pagecache by reading the first 4k then
writing it back with O_DIRECT.
However O_DIRECT is supported on very few filesystems in 2.4. ext2 and
reiserfs have it.
XFS in 2.4 has O_DIRECT, I think, but I don't know if the invalidation
side-effect works on XFS.
> A related question...if no posix_fadvise() advice has been given, does
> reading sequentially every byte of an 8GB file on a machine with <=
> 8GB of RAM guarantee that any page cache data that existed on the
> machine prior to the start of the 8GB read is now gone?
It's not guaranteed that this will work - if the pages which you're trying
to evict were accessed multiple times then it may take more page
replacement to reliably shoot them down. But writing a 2xmemory file and
then deleting it will be a reasonably effective way of evicting most of
the other pagecache.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Philippe Troin: "Re: lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags!!!"
- In reply to: Benjamin Rutt: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Hans Reiser: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Reply: Hans Reiser: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Reply: Benjamin Rutt: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Reply: Nathan Scott: "Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|