Re: "swap_free: Unused swap offset entry 00000100" but no crash?
From: Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo.tosatti_at_cyclades.com)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:58:59 -0300 To: Robin Holt <email@example.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 07:53:04AM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:30:02PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:21:54 +0200,
> > Marcin Owsiany <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > kernel: swap_free: Unused swap offset entry 00000100
> > >Also, I would be grateful if someone could explain what is that number in the
> > >message supposed to be? An address?
> > It is a swap partition number, but I doubt that you have 256 swap
> > partitions in your system. Single bit set in a word that is meant to
> > be 0, most likely to be caused by a hardware single bit error. Run
> > memtest, burn86 or other memory verification checks.
> I remember a race condition I thought was possible, but couldn't exactly
> pin down the exact sequence. Give me a chance to dig through some of
> my notes and see what I come across.
Would love to hear more details about this.
> I think I could understand this if there two messages with each invocation,
> but not with one.
> Marcin, you have a process with a Page Table Entry which indicates it is
> pointing to a page which has been swapped out to block 0 of swap device
> 256. This is probably caused by a problem in the kernel. You can certainly
> run memtest et al. If you don't find anything, I would assume the problem
> is in the kernel.
Marcin, please run the memtest86 and report back.
> Most of the code in the area you would be affected by has changed
> drastically in the 2.6 kernel.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/