Re: [OT] German court says the GPL is effective
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_fs.tum.de)
Date: 07/29/04
- Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: inode_unused list corruption in 2.4.26 - spin_lock problem?"
- In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: [OT] German court says the GPL is effective"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:11:05 +0200 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:28:25AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > I know this is off-topic, but a court in my home town Munich has decided
> > that a cease and desist letter Harald Welte sent to a router producer
> > (Sitecom) who used netfilter/iptables in his router but didn't publish
> > the sources of the firmware with a penalty of up to 100 000 Euro is
> > valid (a German version of the decision of the three judges is at [1]).
> >
> > It's quite nice to hear that a court has decided that the GPL is
> > enforceable under German law.
> >
> > [1] http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf
>
> Has this verdict become final yet?
No, it's not yet final.
> Matthias Andree
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: inode_unused list corruption in 2.4.26 - spin_lock problem?"
- In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: [OT] German court says the GPL is effective"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
