Re: New dev model (was [PATCH] delete devfs)

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_fs.tum.de)
Date: 07/29/04

  • Next message: Carsten Rietzschel: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc2-L2 - modem dialup broken"
    Date:	Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:25:43 +0200
    To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
    
    

    On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:55:39AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote:
    > >
    > > Changes that remove functionally like Greg's patch are hopefully
    > > still 2.7 stuff - 2.6 is a stable kernel series and smooth upgrades
    > > inside a stable kernel series are a must for many users.
    >
    > I don't necessarily agree that such changes in the userspace interface
    > should be tied to the kernel version number, really. That's a three or
    > four year warning period, which is unreasonably long. Six to twelve months
    > should be long enough for udev-based replacements to stabilise and
    > propagate out into distributions.
    >
    > That being said, mid-2005 would be an appropriate time to remove devfs. If
    > that schedule pushes things along faster than they would otherwise have
    > progressed, well, good.
    >...

    I'm currently wondering whether part of our discussion might be about a
    non-issue:

    It's true that there's not a pressing need for opening 2.7 today.

    But do you assume that this will still be true one year from now?

    If 2.7 will open during the next 12 months, "mid-2005" would still be
    after 2.7 opened, and such non-urgent cleanups could then go into 2.7 .

    cu
    Adrian

    -- 
           "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
            of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
           "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                           Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Carsten Rietzschel: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc2-L2 - modem dialup broken"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1
      ... > It breaks compilation with gcc-4.0 ... This patch is correct, too. ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
      ... reverting my patch would be more ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection
      ... I had a short try to port Debian's patch ... This is not related to the issues my patch addresses. ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [2.6 patch] update Dag Brattlis email address
      ... > This patch is huge. ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [-mm patch] SCSI_QLA2ABC options must select FW_LOADER
      ... > I send a patch for this yesterday that lets SCSI_QLA2XXX select ... stay as it is (with the fixes from my patches) doesn't matter much - ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)