Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted
From: Rik van Riel (riel_at_redhat.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Previous message: John Lenz: "Re: Backlight and LCD module patches [2]"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted"
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted"
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:51:27 -0400 (EDT) To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I seem to recall that Andrea identified reasons why per-user mlock
> limits were fundamentally broken/unsuitable, but I forget the details.
> Perhaps he could remind us?
Fixed in the current patch.
> As for this patch: it's a new capability which will get basically zero
> testing for the next year, which is a worry. How have you tested it, and
> how much?
It's been in RHEL3 for a while now. First with the
the mistake Andrea identified, but that code's been
fixed too now...
-- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: John Lenz: "Re: Backlight and LCD module patches [2]"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted"
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted"
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
