Re: [PATCH] Improve pci_alloc_consistent wrapper on preemptive kernels
From: Andi Kleen (ak_at_suse.de)
Date: 07/30/04
- Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: [PATCH] Configure IDE probe delays"
- In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] Improve pci_alloc_consistent wrapper on preemptive kernels"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Improve pci_alloc_consistent wrapper on preemptive kernels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:42:44 +0200 To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:07:57 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Certainly. Therefore, changing from GFP_ATOMIC will increase likelihood
> of breakage, no?
No, except for places that are already broken on preemptive kernels
(and note this change only does something on preemptive kernels)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: [PATCH] Configure IDE probe delays"
- In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] Improve pci_alloc_consistent wrapper on preemptive kernels"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Improve pci_alloc_consistent wrapper on preemptive kernels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
