RE: [Linux-cluster] Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSI 1.0.0 released!!
From: Walker, Bruce J (bruce.walker_at_hp.com)
Date: 07/31/04
- Previous message: Jesse Barnes: "Re: [PATCH] add PCI ROMs to sysfs"
- Next in thread: Walker, Bruce J: "RE: [Linux-cluster] Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSI 1.0.0 released!!"
- Maybe reply: Walker, Bruce J: "RE: [Linux-cluster] Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSI 1.0.0 released!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:00:34 -0700 To: "Discussion of clustering software components including GFS" <linux-cluster@redhat.com>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Kevin,
Got out of bed on the wrong side? Such anger. First, the
clusterwide device capability is a very small part of OpenSSI so your
comment "put the entire clustering layer on top of it" is COMPLETELY
wrong - you clearly are commenting about something you know nothing
about. In the 2.4 implementation, providing this one capability by
leveraging devfs was quite economic, efficient and has been very stable.
I'm not sure who you mean by "that's what WE want". If you mean the
current worldwide users of OpenSSI on 2.4, they are a very happy group
with a kick-ass clustering capability.
About one thing you are correct. We are going to have to have a way to
lookup and name remote devices in 2.6. I believe the remote file-op
mechanism we are using in 2.4 will adapt easily.
Bruce Walker
Architect and project manager - OpenSSI project
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com
> [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Kevin
> P. Fleming
> Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 7:41 AM
> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Cc: linux-cluster@redhat.com;
> opengfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
> opengfs-users@lists.sourceforge.net;
> opendlm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Linux-cluster] Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSI 1.0.0 released!!
>
>
> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
> > 5. Devices
> > * there is a clusterwide device model via the devfs code
>
> Yeah, that's we want, take buggy, unreliable,
> soon-to-be-removed-from-mainline code and put an entire
> clustering layer
> on top of it. Too bad someone is going to need to completely
> reimplement
> this "clusterwide device model".
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jesse Barnes: "Re: [PATCH] add PCI ROMs to sysfs"
- Next in thread: Walker, Bruce J: "RE: [Linux-cluster] Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSI 1.0.0 released!!"
- Maybe reply: Walker, Bruce J: "RE: [Linux-cluster] Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSI 1.0.0 released!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: [SLE] Looking for a book that describes highly available DHCP setups
... > dhcpd has clustering capability included, ... > Linux-HA is not
sufficient, as this doesn't synchronize the DHCP ... > leases between the clustering nodes.
... Usage of ISC dhcpd's failover capabilities avoids that problem. ... (SuSE) - Re: How to map high memory for block io
... The way I'm proposing to fix this for mmci is to introduce a ... new capability
which says "clustering is supported by this driver." ... (The side effect of this patch
is that everyone ends up with clustering ... (Linux-Kernel) - How does clustering assign multiple IP addresses?
... This isn't so much to do with clustering per se but clustering makes use of ...
this capability. ... When a virtual server is created, a single adapter can
be ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering) - Re: Windows 2000 server and advanced server.
... Asside from supporting more memory and more processors, Advanced Server has the capability
to do clustering. ... Windows 2000 Server cannot do clustering. ... (microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server)