Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices
From: Eric Lammerts (eric_at_lammerts.org)
Date: 08/08/04
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Solving suspend-level confusion"
- In reply to: Joerg Schilling: "Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices"
- Next in thread: Joerg Schilling: "Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 13:31:41 -0400 (EDT) To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> The CAM interface (which is from the SCSI standards group)
> usually is implemeted in a way that applications open /dev/cam and
> later supply bus, target and lun in order to get connected
> to any device on the system that talks SCSI.
>
> Let me repeat: If you believe that this is a bad idea, give very
> good reasons.
With this interface, how do you grant non-root users access to a CD
writer, but prevent them from directly accessing a SCSI harddisk?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Solving suspend-level confusion"
- In reply to: Joerg Schilling: "Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices"
- Next in thread: Joerg Schilling: "Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|