Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"
From: Roman Zippel (zippel_at_linux-m68k.org)
Date: 08/12/04
- Previous message: formation.trois_at_laposte.net: "Gestion des Approvisionnements et Négociation"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:59:25 +0200 (CEST) To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Roman, a related Q.
> > Why not error out, or at least warn when encountering an unknow
> > symbol in a 'depends on' statement?
> >...
>
> That doesn't sound like a good idea, consider e.g.:
>
> config BAGETLANCE
> tristate "Baget AMD LANCE support"
> depends on NET_ETHERNET && BAGET_MIPS
This is less a problem, as here it's clear that you want a boolean result,
but something like "FOO=n" is really a string compare and FOO could be of
any type (that 99% of all symbols are boolean/tristate symbols doesn't
really help).
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: formation.trois_at_laposte.net: "Gestion des Approvisionnements et Négociation"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
