Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_fs.tum.de)
Date: 08/13/04
- Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- Reply: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- Reply: Cornelia Huck: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:54:12 +0200 To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:32:55PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Roman,
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > config W1
> > tristate "Dallas's 1-wire support"
> > + select NET
>
> What's wrong with a simple dependency?
it's common practice to make it easier for people configuring the kernel
to use select instead of depends in such cases.
It's also relatively safe since NET itself doesn't has any dependencies.
> bye, Roman
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- Reply: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- Reply: Cornelia Huck: "Re: [2.6 patch] let W1 select NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
