Re: [PATCH] add scheduler domains for ia64

From: Jesse Barnes (jbarnes_at_engr.sgi.com)
Date: 08/14/04

  • Next message: Greg Norris: "Re: Linux v2.6.8 - Oops on NFSv3"
    To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
    Date:	Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:52:01 -0700
    
    

    On Friday, August 13, 2004 8:23 pm, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > Andrew's latest tree should have a number of improvements and changes
    > to the sched domains code which you will need to synch up to.

    Yeah, I forgot about those. I'll respin against your consolidation stuff.

    > One issue you may have is that Ingo removed the ability to have arch
    > code override the domain structure due to it being too hazardous for
    > architectures to use in this form (which I don't entirely disagree with).
    >
    > Now I guess your patch could go into the generic code because it is
    > pretty general - however are you guys going to want to do anything
    > more fancy with these things?

    Maybe, we haven't figured out the best way to schedule on a 512p yet, but most
    or all of this code is generic. In order for things to work at all though,
    we'll need to change some of the SD_NODE_INIT values, maybe we can keep that
    as per-arch?

    Thanks,
    Jesse
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Greg Norris: "Re: Linux v2.6.8 - Oops on NFSv3"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: bug in sched.c:activate_task()
      ... >> distrub the scheduler fixing some balancing problem. ... sched domains didn't change anything there (and IIRC it used ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: New NUMA scheduler and hotplug CPU
      ... > for what specific architectures want. ... > the generic NUMA topology info which will have to be handled ... > There aren't any fundamental design issues (with sched domains) ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
      ... >>sched domains can provide non overlapping top level partitions. ... interface and a decent userspace management tool. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
      ... >> Cant sched domains be used handle the CPU groupings and the ... > sched domains can provide non overlapping top level partitions. ... Not fancy seems like a positive thing to me;-) ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)