Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"
From: Roman Zippel (zippel_at_linux-m68k.org)
Date: 08/16/04
- Previous message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks?"
- In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:01:35 +0200 (CEST) To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > What about normal numbers? I don't think requiring quotes everywhere for
> > this is a good idea.
>
> And numbers (both decimal and hex) can easily be distinguished from y, n, and m
> anyway.
I did consider this at some point, but I didn't want to add further
special cases. Every symbol has a tristate and a string value and so you
can compare pretty much everything with everything else. Splitting the
string value further into other types isn't worth the trouble. The problem
at hand is easy enough to solve by adding a type declaration.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks?"
- In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|