Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Date: 08/29/04
- Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4"
- In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4"
- Next in thread: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4"
- Reply: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:36:29 +0100 To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:28:42AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> just use a view, and skip the options on the system calls. if you cd to
> /nometas/your_home_directory_path you don't see the metafiles. Why is a
> view better than a syscall flag? Because it lets the user choose what
> he wants without recompiling to do it. This kind of a view requires no
> coding because you can just mount the root filesystem two ways, one with
> the -nopseudos mount option, and one without it.
*What*?
OK, now I want detailed explanation of the reasons why that doesn't create
cache coherency problems.
Do you have an analysis of locking in the entire thing?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4"
- In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4"
- Next in thread: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4"
- Reply: viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk: "Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|