Re: [DOC] Linux kernel patch submission format
From: Erik Mouw (erik_at_harddisk-recovery.com)
Date: 08/31/04
- Previous message: Herbert Poetzl: "RCU callback and scheduling while atomic!"
- In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "[DOC] Linux kernel patch submission format"
- Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: [DOC] Linux kernel patch submission format"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:17:28 +0200 To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:08:21AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I tried to keep it as short as possible: here is a page describing the
> most optimal format for sending patches to Linux kernel developers.
>
> http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
Looks good.
> This URL should be permanent, feel free to bookmark it.
> Comments welcome.
What about including this in the kernel tarball itself so it can't get
lost? You could include it in Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Erik
-- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Herbert Poetzl: "RCU callback and scheduling while atomic!"
- In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "[DOC] Linux kernel patch submission format"
- Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: [DOC] Linux kernel patch submission format"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
