Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5
From: Ingo Molnar (mingo_at_elte.hu)
Date: 08/31/04
- Previous message: Russell King: "Re: MMC block major dev"
- In reply to: Thomas Charbonnel: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5"
- Next in thread: Thomas Charbonnel: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5"
- Reply: Thomas Charbonnel: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:30:29 +0200 To: Thomas Charbonnel <thomas@undata.org>
* Thomas Charbonnel <thomas@undata.org> wrote:
> As you can see ~1ms was probably an accident, and the latency does not
> always come from do_timer. The constant is do_IRQ interrupting the
> idle thread.
(do you have any sort of powersaving mode (ACPI/APM) enabled? If yes,
could you try to tune it down as much as possible - disable any
powersaving option in the BIOS and in the .config - kill apmd, etc.)
but i dont think it's powersaving - why would such an overhead show up
in those functions. The only common thing seems to be that both
mark_offset_tsc() and mask_and_ack_8259A() does port IO, which is slow -
but still it shouldnt take ~0.5 msecs!
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Russell King: "Re: MMC block major dev"
- In reply to: Thomas Charbonnel: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5"
- Next in thread: Thomas Charbonnel: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5"
- Reply: Thomas Charbonnel: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]