Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm2: why is DIGIEPCA marked BROKEN?
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_fs.tum.de)
Date: 08/31/04
- Previous message: Jamie: "[PROBLEM] 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 fails to compile (others report same error)"
- Maybe in reply to: Adrian Bunk: "2.6.9-rc1-mm2: why is DIGIEPCA marked BROKEN?"
- Next in thread: Gene Heskett: "Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:59:52 +0200 To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:57:53PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 07:47:19PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If I revert mark-pcxx-as-broken.patch, the driver compiles UP for me
> > with exactly zero errors or warnings.
> >
> > @Christoph:
> > Could you post the errors you observed?
>
> Umm, sorry. As the patch name says it should have marked the pcxx
> driver (CONFIG_DIGI) as broken.
>...
Too late, my patch to fix the compile errors in DIGI was already sent.
;-)
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jamie: "[PROBLEM] 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 fails to compile (others report same error)"
- Maybe in reply to: Adrian Bunk: "2.6.9-rc1-mm2: why is DIGIEPCA marked BROKEN?"
- Next in thread: Gene Heskett: "Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
