Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7
From: Ingo Molnar (mingo_at_elte.hu)
Date: 09/02/04
- Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Maybe in reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:37:19 +0200 To: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
* K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:
> This is an interesting one. ~3.9ms generated here by amlat in do_IRQ:
the overhead is not in do_IRQ():
> 00000001 0.000ms (+0.000ms): n_tty_receive_buf (pty_write)
> 00010001 3.992ms (+3.992ms): do_IRQ (n_tty_receive_buf)
the overhead is always relative to the previous entry - so the overhead
was in n_tty_receive_buf() [that is the function that was interrupted by
do_IRQ()]. But it's a bit weird - you should have gotten timer IRQs
every 1 msec. Does n_tty_receive_buf() run with irqs disabled perhaps?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Maybe in reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
