Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7
Mark_H_Johnson_at_Raytheon.com
Date: 09/02/04
- Previous message: Rohit Neupane: "Re: Weird Problem with TCP"
- Maybe in reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:33:27 -0500
>> I also looked briefly at find_first_bit since it appears in a number
>> of traces. Just curious, but the coding for the i386 version is MUCH
>> different in style than several other architectures (e.g, PPC64,
>> SPARC). Is there some reason why it is recursive on the x86 and a loop
>> in the others?
>
>what do you mean by recursive? It uses the SCAS (scan string) x86
>instruction.
Never mind. In bitops.c I misread "find_first_bit" (the call near the end)
as "find_next_bit" and thought there was recursion here.
--Mark H Johnson
<mailto:Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Rohit Neupane: "Re: Weird Problem with TCP"
- Maybe in reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|