Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity
From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds_at_osdl.org)
Date: 09/05/04
- Previous message: haiquy_at_yahoo.com: "nbd questions and problems"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul Jackson: "Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity"
- Next in thread: Paul Jackson: "Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity"
- Reply: Paul Jackson: "Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 17:18:30 -0700 (PDT) To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Paul Jackson wrote:
>
> How is what Linus left more broken?
It's not. If anything, we should probably remove even more.
I don't see what the problem was with just requiring the right damn size.
User mode can trivially get the size by asking for it. But if it can't be
bothered, then Andi's code certainly just made things worse.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: haiquy_at_yahoo.com: "nbd questions and problems"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul Jackson: "Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity"
- Next in thread: Paul Jackson: "Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity"
- Reply: Paul Jackson: "Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Fix argument checking in sched_setaffinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
