unneeded #include <version.h> in many places ?
From: Krzysztof Halasa (khc_at_pm.waw.pl)
Date: 09/07/04
- Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] unexport get_wchan"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: unneeded #include <version.h> in many places ?"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: unneeded #include <version.h> in many places ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 18:17:53 +0200
Hi,
I noticed some kernel .c files #include <version.h> which typically
contains something like:
#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.9-rc1"
#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132617
#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
However, those files don't reference the macros.
The question is: are these includes completely unneeded, so I can
remove them, or do they serve some special purpose?
Another one: there are drivers using constructs like:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE > 0x20115
...
#endif
I understand they can be somehow useful for authors supporting many
kernel versions with a single set of files, however the gain isn't
clear to me. Should such conditional code be a) removed, b) left
in place, c) dealt with each case individually?
-- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] unexport get_wchan"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: unneeded #include <version.h> in many places ?"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: unneeded #include <version.h> in many places ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|